Blog

Details

Three People. One Relationship. A Lot of Assumptions.

People see three people in a relationship and almost immediately start trying to solve it.

Who is really with whom?

Who gets jealous?

Who is the “third”?

Who has the most power?

Who is sleeping with whom?

Who is secretly unhappy?

Who is going to get hurt?

It is interesting how quickly people move from seeing a relationship to trying to categorize it.

And I understand why.

Most of us were handed a very specific template for love.

Two people.

One couple.

One path.

One definition of commitment.

So when something falls outside that template, the instinct is often to examine the structure before we ever ask about the people inside it.

But the most important thing about our relationship was never that there were three of us.

It was that three human beings were trying to love one another.

And human beings are complicated.

Three People Does Not Mean Three Copies of the Same Relationship

This is one of the things people often miss.

A relationship involving three people is not one relationship multiplied by three.

Each connection has its own energy.

Its own history.

Its own language.

Its own needs.

Its own strengths.

Its own tender places.

The relationship between Trent and me was not identical to the relationship between Trent and Nita.

My relationship with Nita was its own thing too.

And then there was the relationship created by all three of us together.

That is a lot of humanity in one room. 😂

There were beautiful moments.

There were painful ones.

There were times we understood one another deeply.

There were times we absolutely did not.

There was laughter, intimacy, frustration, belonging, conflict, growth, mistakes, and repair.

In other words:

There were relationships.

Polyamory Does Not Remove Human Emotion

Sometimes people imagine that if you choose an unconventional relationship, you must somehow stop experiencing very conventional emotions.

Nope. 😂

Jealousy can still exist.

Fear can still exist.

Insecurity can still exist.

Attachment can still exist.

So can tenderness.

Generosity.

Joy.

Compersion.

Desire.

Friendship.

And profound love.

The structure does not magically make people more evolved.

It also does not automatically make them dysfunctional.

It simply creates a different landscape in which very human things still happen.

The Question Was Never, “Can Three People Love Each Other?”

Of course they can.

Humans are capable of loving more than one person all the time.

We love multiple children.

Multiple friends.

Multiple family members.

Love itself is rarely the scarce resource.

The harder questions are usually about everything surrounding love.

Can we communicate honestly?

Can we tolerate discomfort without trying to control each other?

Can we make room for different needs?

Can we tell the truth when the truth is inconvenient?

Can we stay connected to ourselves while being deeply connected to someone else?

Can we repair when we hurt each other?

Those questions exist in monogamous relationships too.

They just become harder to hide when there are more people in the room.

There Was Beauty There

This matters to me.

Because unconventional relationships are often discussed only in terms of danger.

Someone will get jealous.

Someone will be left out.

Someone will be replaced.

Someone will eventually get hurt.

And yes, people can hurt each other.

We did.

But hurt is not unique to polyamory.

Neither is betrayal.

Neither is insecurity.

Neither is heartbreak.

What often gets left out of the conversation is the beauty.

The shared jokes nobody else understands.

Three people piled into a kitchen talking at once.

The ridiculous logistics.

The affection.

The way one person could sometimes see something another person could not.

The feeling of building something no one had handed us a blueprint for.

The freedom of realizing that love did not always have to look the way we had been told it should.

There was real beauty in that.

I will never pretend otherwise simply because the relationship was complicated.

Complicated Does Not Mean Fake

I think we do something strange with relationships.

When a traditional relationship struggles, we usually say the people are struggling.

When an unconventional relationship struggles, people often blame the structure itself.

See?

That’s why this doesn’t work.

But that is too easy.

Relationships end for countless reasons.

People change.

Needs change.

Dynamics shift.

Old wounds show up.

People grow in different directions.

Sometimes love remains and the form of the relationship still needs to change.

That does not mean the love was imaginary.

It does not mean the good parts were a mistake.

And it does not mean the people involved were foolish for trying.

Something can be real without lasting forever in the same form.

That has become an important truth in my life.

We Were Never Trying to Prove Anything

Our relationship was not an argument for polyamory.

We were not trying to prove that three is better than two.

We were not trying to convince anyone to live like us.

We were living our lives.

Learning.

Experimenting.

Loving.

Getting things wrong.

Getting some things beautifully right.

And eventually allowing people to see some of it.

That visibility came with assumptions.

Lots of them.

But I have learned that people will often decide what something means before they understand what actually happened.

I cannot control that.

What I can do is tell the truth about my own experience.

The Truth Is More Interesting Than the Label

Yes, we were a throuple.

Yes, we practiced polyamory.

Those words are useful.

But they do not tell you very much about what it felt like to be us.

Labels describe structure.

They do not describe tenderness.

They do not tell you who made everyone laugh.

Who needed reassurance.

Who avoided conflict.

Who reached first.

Who pulled away.

Who grew.

Who changed.

Who loved deeply.

Who struggled.

Who tried again.

That is the story I care about.

Not whether our relationship fit neatly inside someone else’s definition of what love was supposed to look like.

But whether we were willing to meet one another as human beings inside it.

If You Want to Understand a Relationship, Start With the People

Not the number.

Not the label.

Not the assumptions.

The people.

Ask whether there is consent.

Ask whether there is honesty.

Ask whether people have agency.

Ask whether they are allowed to have a voice.

Ask whether they can remain themselves while loving one another.

Those questions tell me far more about the health of a relationship than whether there are two people in it or three.

Because at the end of the day, the deepest work of relationship is not about fitting the right structure.

It is about learning how to love without disappearing.

And sometimes, the relationships that look most unusual from the outside reveal just how universal that work really is.

Join the Conversation

What did this bring up for you? I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *